scienceyoucanlove:

Undulatus asperatus

Undulatus asperatus (or alternately, asperatus) is a cloud formation, proposed in 2009 as a separate cloud classification by the founder of the Cloud Appreciation Society. If successful it will be the first cloud formation added since cirrus intortus in 1951 to the International Cloud Atlas of the World Meteorological OrganizationThe name translates approximately as “roughened or agitated waves”.

The clouds are most closely related to undulatus clouds. Although they appear dark and storm-like, they tend to dissipate without a storm forming. The ominous-looking clouds have been particularly common in the Plains states of the United States, often during the morning or midday hours following convective thunderstorm activity. As of June 2009 the Royal Meteorological Society is gathering evidence of the type of weather patterns in which undulatus asperatus clouds appear, so as to study how they form and decide whether they are distinct from other undulatus clouds.

read more 

(via scienceyoucanlove-deactivated20)

scienceyoucanlove:
“This beach in the Maldives glows like millions of stars at night.
Dinoflagellates, have the ability to emit blue-green light, in a process called bioluminescence after being mechanically stimulated by waves or swimming for...

scienceyoucanlove:

This beach in the Maldives glows like millions of stars at night. 
Dinoflagellates, have the ability to emit blue-green light, in a process called bioluminescence after being mechanically stimulated by waves or swimming for example. This can be a defense mechanism, startling predators or drawing attention to themselves, making the predator vulnerable to other predators. 

via Natural Selection 

through SI

(via scienceyoucanlove-deactivated20)

we-are-star-stuff:
“Can our brains see the fourth dimension? Most of us are accustomed to watching 2-D; even though characters on the screen appear to have depth and texture, the image is actually flat. But when we put on 3-D glasses, we see a world...

we-are-star-stuff:

Can our brains see the fourth dimension?

Most of us are accustomed to watching 2-D; even though characters on the screen appear to have depth and texture, the image is actually flat. But when we put on 3-D glasses, we see a world that has shape, a world that we could walk in. We can imagine existing in such a world because we live in one. The things in our daily life have height, width and length. But for someone who’s only known life in two dimensions, 3-D would be impossible to comprehend. And that, according to many researchers, is the reason we can’t see the fourth dimension, or any other dimension beyond that. Physicists work under the assumption that there are at least 10 dimensions, but the majority of us will never “see” them. Because we only know life in 3-D, our brains don’t understand how to look for anything more.

In 1884, Edwin A. Abbot published a novel that depicts the problem of seeing dimensions beyond your own. In “Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions“ Abbot describes the life of a square in a two-dimensional world. Living in 2-D means that the square is surrounded by circles, triangles and rectangles, but all the square sees are other lines. One day, the square is visited by a sphere. On first glance, the sphere just looks like a circle to the square, and the square can’t comprehend what the sphere means when he explains 3-D objects. Eventually, the sphere takes the square to the 3-D world, and the square understands. He sees not just lines, but entire shapes that have depth. Emboldened, the square asks the sphere what exists beyond the 3-D world; the sphere is appalled. The sphere can’t comprehend a world beyond this, and in this way, stands in for the reader. Our brains aren’t trained to see anything other than our world, and it will likely take something from another dimension to make us understand.

But what is this other dimension? Mystics used to see it as a place where spirits lived, since they weren’t bound by our earthly rules. In his theory of special relativity, Einstein called the fourth dimension time, but noted that time is inseparable from space. Science fiction aficionados may recognize that union as space-time, and indeed, the idea of a space-time continuum has been popularized by science fiction writers for centuries. Einstein described gravity as a bend in space-time. Today, some physicists describe the fourth dimension as any space that’s perpendicular to a cube - the problem being that most of us can’t visualize something that is perpendicular to a cube.

Researchers have used Einstein’s ideas to determine whether we can travel through time. While we can move in any direction in our 3-D world, we can only move forward in time. Thus, traveling to the past has been deemed near-impossible, though some researchers still hold out hope for finding wormholes that connect to different sections of space-time.

If we can’t use the fourth dimension to time travel, and if we can’t even see the fourth dimension, then what’s the point of knowing about it? Understanding these higher dimensions is of importance to mathematicians and physicists because it helps them understand the world. String theory, for example, relies upon at least 10 dimensions to remain viable. For these researchers, the answers to complex problems in the 3-D world may be found in the next dimension - and beyond.

[via]

malformalady:
“ Eyes have now joined the long list of objects that can be printed in 3D, thanks to the ingenuity of British designers. London-based Fripp Design and Research collaborated with Manchester Metropolitan University to produce prosthetic...

malformalady:

Eyes have now joined the long list of objects that can be printed in 3D, thanks to the ingenuity of British designers. London-based Fripp Design and Research collaborated with Manchester Metropolitan University to produce prosthetic eyes that are barely distinguishable from the real thing. What’s more, they can produce around 150 in an hour at a fraction of the cost of eyes made by hand, the method currently used to craft them. Hand-painted eyes take a very long time to produce and cost around £3,000 each. Fripp Design can make them for £100. It also prints flexible facial prosthetics to support the eye.

(via we-are-star-stuff)

jtotheizzoe:

Is Technology Killing Your Memory?

This video comes from BrainCraft, a new neuroscience and psychology-themed YouTube channel (follow BrainCraft on Tumblr here). Really looking forward to more! It got me thinking …

Where did I leave my keys? What’s Avogadro’s number? That song I was listening to yesterday, what’s the name of the band again?

We encounter questions like these every day, some simple, some complex. Some are based on experiences, some on detailed information. Unfortunately, the chemical and biological information storage and recall method that we call “memory” is not at all like the digital storage that Google and modern digital entities use to catalog the world’s knowledge and data. 

No, our memories are not perfect imprints of a point in time, as nice as that would be. And we do not recall neural information using any sort of logical catalogue, which would be so helpful. It’s just neural networks, firing and refiring, never exactly the same way twice. Memory is more like a walk through a familiar wood, along a well-traveled footpath that is constantly worn and reworn, the forest floor creeping in upon it after we pass and requiring that we stroll along it from time to time lest we lose it altogether.

The imperfection of memory is one of the very reasons we invented digital computing devices. As their capabilities have grown, we have begun to use them to buttress the very cathedral of our mind, making them a truly integral part of our cognitive process. We are, should we choose to be, a hybrid mind, silicon and cellular.

So is Google a crutch that is weakening our brain? Or a new, powerful tool that expands the possibilities for our intellectual evolution? Or something in between?

(Source: youtube.com, via we-are-star-stuff)

wildcat2030:
“ Do We Live in the Matrix? Tests could reveal whether we are part of a giant computer simulation — but the real question is if we want to know…
In the 1999 sci-fi film classic The Matrix, the protagonist, Neo, is stunned to see people...

wildcat2030:

Do We Live in the Matrix?

Tests could reveal whether we are part of a giant computer simulation — but the real question is if we want to know…

In the 1999 sci-fi film classic The Matrix, the protagonist, Neo, is stunned to see people defying the laws of physics, running up walls and vanishing suddenly. These superhuman violations of the rules of the universe are possible because, unbeknownst to him, Neo’s consciousness is embedded in the Matrix, a virtual-reality simulation created by sentient machines. 

The action really begins when Neo is given a fateful choice: Take the blue pill and return to his oblivious, virtual existence, or take the red pill to learn the truth about the Matrix and find out “how deep the rabbit hole goes.” 

Physicists can now offer us the same choice, the ability to test whether we live in our own virtual Matrix, by studying radiation from space. As fanciful as it sounds, some philosophers have long argued that we’re actually more likely to be artificial intelligences trapped in a fake universe than we are organic minds in the “real” one. 

But if that were true, the very laws of physics that allow us to devise such reality-checking technology may have little to do with the fundamental rules that govern the meta-universe inhabited by our simulators. To us, these programmers would be gods, able to twist reality on a whim. 

So should we say yes to the offer to take the red pill and learn the truth — or are the implications too disturbing?

(via we-are-star-stuff)

thisistheverge:
“This is how you turn Obama’s speech about 3D printing into a 3D-printed sculpture
“A once-shuttered warehouse is now a state-of-the-art lab where new workers are mastering the 3D printing that has the potential to revolutionize the...

thisistheverge:

This is how you turn Obama’s speech about 3D printing into a 3D-printed sculpture

“A once-shuttered warehouse is now a state-of-the-art lab where new workers are mastering the 3D printing that has the potential to revolutionize the way we make almost everything.” This is the first line you’ll hear when you start playing the 39-second voice clip from “voice sculptor” Gilles Azzaro’s Next Industrial Revolution, an artistic reworking of President Barack Obama’s 2013 State of the Union Address. 

(via we-are-star-stuff)

"

Most people, Dr. Ellenbogen says, think of the sleeping brain as similar to a computer that has “gone to sleep” — it does nothing productive. Wrong. Sleep enhances performance, learning and memory. Most unappreciated of all, sleep improves creative ability to generate aha! moments and to uncover novel connections among seemingly unrelated ideas.

[…]

Some sort of incubation period, in which a person leaves an idea for a while, is crucial to creativity. During the incubation period, sleep may help the brain process a problem.

[…]

Dr. Ellenbogen’s research at Harvard indicates that if an incubation period includes sleep, people are 33 percent more likely to infer connections among distantly related ideas, and yet, as he puts it, these performance enhancements exist “completely beneath the radar screen.” In other words, people are more creative after sleep, but they don’t know it.

"
-

Here’s the science to the creative benefits of sleep, aptly called “the greatest creative aphrodisiac.” Decades earlier, T. S. Eliot championed the notion of “idea incubation” and even longer ago, Thomas Edison used power-naps as his secret weapon

Pair with the science of what happens when you sleep and how it affects your every waking moment.

(via we-are-star-stuff)

(Source: explore-blog, via we-are-star-stuff)


Indy Theme by Safe As Milk